[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205153104.GA7123@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 07:31:04 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: Serban Constantinescu <serban.constantinescu@....com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, irogers@...gle.com,
Dave.Butcher@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
arve@...roid.com, john.stultz@...aro.org, ccross@...roid.com,
romlem@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/9] staging: android: binder: Move some of the logic
into subfunction
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 11:18:22AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 06:09:33PM +0000, Serban Constantinescu wrote:
> > +static void bc_increfs_done(struct binder_proc *proc,
> > + struct binder_thread *thread, uint32_t cmd,
> > + void __user *node_ptr, void __user *cookie)
> > +{
> > + struct binder_node *node;
> > +
> > + node = binder_get_node(proc, node_ptr);
> > + if (node == NULL) {
> > + binder_user_error("%d:%d %s u%p no match\n",
> > + proc->pid, thread->pid,
> > + cmd == BC_INCREFS_DONE ?
> > + "BC_INCREFS_DONE" :
> > + "BC_ACQUIRE_DONE",
> > + node_ptr);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (cookie != node->cookie) {
> > + binder_user_error("%d:%d %s u%p node %d cookie mismatch %p != %p\n",
> > + proc->pid, thread->pid,
> > + cmd == BC_INCREFS_DONE ?
> > + "BC_INCREFS_DONE" : "BC_ACQUIRE_DONE",
> > + node_ptr, node->debug_id,
> > + cookie, node->cookie);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + if (cmd == BC_ACQUIRE_DONE) {
> > + if (node->pending_strong_ref == 0) {
> > + binder_user_error("%d:%d BC_ACQUIRE_DONE node %d has no pending acquire request\n",
> > + proc->pid, thread->pid,
> > + node->debug_id);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + node->pending_strong_ref = 0;
> > + } else {
> > + if (node->pending_weak_ref == 0) {
> > + binder_user_error("%d:%d BC_INCREFS_DONE node %d has no pending increfs request\n",
> > + proc->pid, thread->pid,
> > + node->debug_id);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > + node->pending_weak_ref = 0;
> > + }
> > + binder_dec_node(node, cmd == BC_ACQUIRE_DONE, 0);
> > + binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_USER_REFS,
> > + "%d:%d %s node %d ls %d lw %d\n",
> > + proc->pid, thread->pid,
> > + cmd == BC_INCREFS_DONE ?
> > + "BC_INCREFS_DONE" :
> > + "BC_ACQUIRE_DONE",
> > + node->debug_id, node->local_strong_refs,
> > + node->local_weak_refs);
> > + return;
> > +}
>
> This function is 52 lines long but at least 32 of those lines are
> debug code.
>
> Just extra of lines of code means you have increased the number of bugs
> 150%. But what I know is that from a static analysis perspective, debug
> code has more defects per line then regular code it's worse than that.
> Plus all the extra noise obscures the actual logic and makes the real
> code annoying to look at so it's worse still.
>
> If you want to move this stuff out of staging, then remove all the extra
> crap so it doesn't look like barf.
I don't ever think the binder code will be moved out of staging for a
variety of reasons, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't be cleaned up :)
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists