linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.14 #1 (aka move to CCF)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAOesGMi3gOMd-qSGQfUq4_vbO=pJPgo1mj3LFkJmNzQThTwN6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 09:23:57 -0800
From:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Uwe Kleine-König 
	<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: cleanup for 3.14 #1 (aka move to CCF)

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:22 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 8:34 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
>> On 04/12/2013 22:54, Olof Johansson :
>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>>>>
>>>> This is the big move of AT91 to Common Clock Framework for 3.14. I
>>>> collected
>>>> all the material as a "cleanup" topic so that the CCF can be considered
>>>> as a
>>>> base for all our AT91 patches for 3.14.
>>>> I prefer to have the sama5d3 use of AT91 CCF included into this
>>>> pull-request
>>>> so that it can be read as an example and clearly states that it has been
>>>> tested
>>>> in real life.
>>>> We agreed with Mike to send this work upstream through arm-soc so that we
>>>> will
>>>> be able to stack other patches for 3.14 on top of that work without
>>>> having to
>>>> deal with conflicts.
>>>>
>>>> For merging with the "fixes" pull-request that I sent earlier today, I
>>>> also
>>>> uploaded a little branch for reference:
>>>> at91-3.14-next_fixes_cleanup_dt-resolution.
>>>> In two words, the clock section of the arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c file
>>>> has to be deleted.
>>>>
>>>> Do not hesitate to ask questions about this material.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks, best regards,
>>>>
>>>> The following changes since commit
>>>> 6ce4eac1f600b34f2f7f58f9cd8f0503d79e42ae:
>>>>
>>>>    Linux 3.13-rc1 (2013-11-22 11:30:55 -0800)
>>>>
>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>
>>>>    git://github.com/at91linux/linux-at91.git tags/at91-cleanup
>>>>
>>>> for you to fetch changes up to b46e837d8ef1f3c777bbf9513e2cdb5d87d6c374:
>>>>
>>>>    ARM: at91/dt: remove old clk material (2013-12-02 15:31:29 +0100)
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, pulled into next/cleanup. use this branch as base for your
>>> future at91 branches if you need it to avoid conflicts, please.
>>
>>
>> Yes, sure. I still have to synchronize with Uwe as he is building a series
>> for removing timex.h that may conflict with these modifications.
>>
>>
>>> (I named it at91/sama5-ccf in our tree)
>>
>>
>> Well, it seems that the at91/sama5-ccf is not aligned with
>> next/cleanup as of today (94c5216ee93b)
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>
> Seems that I pulled it into for-next instead of next/cleanup. Thanks
> for catching that.

Sorry, no, what I did was that I accidentally checked out for-next
into at91/sama5-ccf instead of your branch. I did merge the right
thing.


-Olof
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/