[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131205.130524.997340443429884333.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:05:24 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, henrik@...tad.us, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation
updates
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:51:46 -0500
> I wish vger wouldn't do that. I wonder how much spam is really flagged
> by this one characteristic alone. That is, spam that would have made it
> otherwise, but because of the Cc list, it was rejected.
10 to 20 spam posts per day are prevented by this rule.
And frankly it's totally rediculous to have such a huge CC: list
in the first place, even if the vger spam filter didn't exist.
If you CC: something to netdev, it's going to reach me, you don't need
to CC: me. If just makes for a dup that I have to delete in my inbox,
so you're actually making more work for me in the end.
That's just one example.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists