lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzMA6gu9cMV5jbfC9quGBJNfh5JdO=dvPOggTwX9io95A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 10:50:06 -0800
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:	linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Btrfs Maintainer update

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Chris Mason <clm@...com> wrote:
>
> I had used git commit -S instead of signing the tag.

Ahh. And that was actually what you had done the first time around for
your test too - but back then I didn't actually *merge* it. Then I
just looked at the top commit and said "yup, it's signed".

And now that I tried to merged it, I noticed my merge commit didn't
get the signage I expected.

And that only happens if I pull a tag that's signed (which also gets
me the message I expect from signed pulls)..

Anyway, now I have both a signature on the merge and on your actual
commit. Thanks,

             Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ