linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/41] percpu: Consistent per cpu operations V1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <00000142c429e9ce-10588a45-ce91-4e10-b58a-d5ad18b3ad39-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:09:10 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/41] percpu: Consistent per cpu operations V1

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:

> > They are included. Please read the complete description. Patches 13
> > 14 and 18 implement the preemption checks.
>
> Indeed I missed them. They should probably go first in the series.

The first patches in the series do not affect __this_cpu ops but
only use this_cpu ops. this_cpu_ptr already checks for preemption. The
first patches are therefore indepedent of new preemptin checking
and I hope that they can be immediately merged even if there are further
issues with the other patches.

> > Other than that they are looking fine now. >

Great. Thanks.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/