linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: gpio: Document regulator-type property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131205204252.GB29268@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Thu, 5 Dec 2013 20:42:52 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: gpio: Document regulator-type property

On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 09:08:59PM +0100, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Thursday 05 December 2013 19:12:01 Mark Brown wrote:

> > +- regulator-type	: Specifies what is being regulated, must be either
> > +			  "voltage" or "current"

> What about adding "The type defaults to voltage if unspecified." ?

I was trying to think of a stronger wording for that - more like "if
specified at all should say "current", "voltage" is also supported for
legacy reasons and is the default.".  I'm not even sure about
documenting voltage here.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)