[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131205212651.GP10988@dastard>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 08:26:51 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [OOPS, 3.13-rc2] null ptr in dio_complete()
On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 10:22:20PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 12:58:38 +1100
> Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > And I just hit this from running xfs_repair which is doing
> > multithreaded direct IO directly on /dev/vdc:
.....
> > So this is looking like another virtio+blk_mq problem....
>
> This one might be caused by using-after-'free' request because the freed
> request may be allocated to another CPU immediately, and the below patch
> may be helpful, would you mind testing it?
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 6875736..2358bdf 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -311,12 +311,12 @@ void blk_mq_complete_request(struct request *rq, int error)
>
> blk_account_io_completion(rq, bytes);
>
> + blk_account_io_done(rq);
> +
> if (rq->end_io)
> rq->end_io(rq, error);
> else
> blk_mq_free_request(rq);
> -
> - blk_account_io_done(rq);
> }
>
> void __blk_mq_end_io(struct request *rq, int error)
Testing it now. I'll let you know how it goes in couple of hours.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists