[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131204185619.2edc9d51.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:56:19 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] test: add minimal module for verification
testing
On Thu, 05 Dec 2013 13:12:17 +1030 Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> writes:
> > When doing module loading verification tests (for example, with module
> > singing, or LSM hooks), it is very handy to have a module that can be
>
> "module singing" sounds like a horrible idea! Is the author even
> musical? I've only heard it said David Howls.
You're such a killjoy.
btw, git log | grep Singed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists