[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131206133339.GC6694@pd.tnic>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 14:33:39 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qemu-devel@...gnu.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>,
Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] X86, mpx: Intel MPX definition
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:52:55AM +0800, Qiaowei Ren wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiaowei Ren <qiaowei.ren@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liu Jinsong <jinsong.liu@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
This patch should probably be merged with the next one...
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> index d3f5c63..6c2738d 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeature.h
> @@ -216,6 +216,7 @@
> #define X86_FEATURE_ERMS (9*32+ 9) /* Enhanced REP MOVSB/STOSB */
> #define X86_FEATURE_INVPCID (9*32+10) /* Invalidate Processor Context ID */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RTM (9*32+11) /* Restricted Transactional Memory */
> +#define X86_FEATURE_MPX (9*32+14) /* Memory Protection Extension */
> #define X86_FEATURE_RDSEED (9*32+18) /* The RDSEED instruction */
> #define X86_FEATURE_ADX (9*32+19) /* The ADCX and ADOX instructions */
> #define X86_FEATURE_SMAP (9*32+20) /* Supervisor Mode Access Prevention */
> @@ -330,6 +331,7 @@ extern const char * const x86_power_flags[32];
> #define cpu_has_perfctr_l2 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_L2)
> #define cpu_has_cx8 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX8)
> #define cpu_has_cx16 boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CX16)
> +#define cpu_has_mpx boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MPX)
... and we're trying to not have more of those macros so people should be simply
using boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_YYY).
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists