[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5e063ab19c8fb9754216189c65d8f670@agner.ch>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 16:00:26 +0100
From: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>, lee.jones@...aro.org
Cc: swarren@...dotorg.org, dev@...xeye.de, lgirdwood@...il.com,
broonie@...nel.org, kai.poggensee@...onic-design.de,
sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] mfd: tps6586x: add version detection
Am 2013-12-06 15:26, schrieb Thierry Reding:
> On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 01:51:45PM +0100, Stefan Agner wrote:
>> Use the VERSIONCRC to determine the exact device version. According to
>> the datasheet this register can be used as device identifier. The
>> identification is needed since some tps6586x regulators use a different
>> voltage table.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>
>> ---
>> Changes since v4:
>> - Use variable named version instead of ret
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - Avoid moving devm_kzalloc
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/tps6586x.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> include/linux/mfd/tps6586x.h | 7 +++++++
>> 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> I think I also already gave my Reviewed-by on both this and 2/3, neither
> of which changed significantly enough to warrant that to be dropped. In
> general it's fine to keep Reviewed-by and Acked-by as long as you're
> only changing minor things.
>
> Thierry
Ok, sorry, didn't realize that is my job to pick them up when doing new
revisions. Lee, can you add this when you apply this patch?
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists