linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFftDdqtXvkF9wpcWv5kyeXSwR1_5FCSrhwRg9SsG5mPHfyEVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 6 Dec 2013 07:39:39 -0800
From:	William Roberts <bill.c.roberts@...il.com>
To:	William Roberts <WRoberts@...sys.com>
Cc:	"linux-audit@...hat.com" <linux-audit@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rgb@...hat.com" <rgb@...hat.com>,
	"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"sds@...ho.nsa.gov" <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline

Sigh...I sent this back out from another emai address and got bounced
from the lists... resending. Sorry for the cruft.

On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 7:34 AM, William Roberts <WRoberts@...sys.com> wrote:
> I sent out 3 patches on 12/2/2013. I didn't get any response. I thought I added the right people based on get_maintainers script.
>
> Can anyone comment on these or point me in the right direction?
>
> RGB, Can you at least ACK the audit subsystem patch " audit: Audit proc cmdline value"?
>
> Thank you,
> Bill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-linux-mm@...ck.org [mailto:owner-linux-mm@...ck.org] On Behalf Of William Roberts
> Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 1:11 PM
> To: linux-audit@...hat.com; linux-mm@...ck.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; rgb@...hat.com; viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
> Cc: sds@...ho.nsa.gov
> Subject: [PATCH] - auditing cmdline
>
> This patch series relates to work started on the audit mailing list.
> It eventually involved touching other modules, so I am trying to pull in those owners as well. In a nutshell I add new utility functions for accessing a processes cmdline value as displayed in proc/<self>/cmdline, and then refactor procfs to use the utility functions, and then add the ability to the audit subsystem to record this value.
>
> Thanks for any feedback and help.
>
> [PATCH 1/3] mm: Create utility functions for accessing a tasks
> [PATCH 2/3] proc: Update get proc_pid_cmdline() to use mm.h helpers
> [PATCH 3/3] audit: Audit proc cmdline value
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@...ck.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@...ck.org"> email@...ck.org </a>



-- 
Respectfully,

William C Roberts
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/