[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20131206214640.943397462@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:50:59 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...t-bretagne.fr>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 09/83] ipv6: protect for_each_sk_fl_rcu in mem_check with rcu_read_lock_bh
3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
[ Upstream commit f8c31c8f80dd882f7eb49276989a4078d33d67a7 ]
Fixes a suspicious rcu derference warning.
Cc: Florent Fourcot <florent.fourcot@...t-bretagne.fr>
Signed-off-by: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
@@ -453,8 +453,10 @@ static int mem_check(struct sock *sk)
if (room > FL_MAX_SIZE - FL_MAX_PER_SOCK)
return 0;
+ rcu_read_lock_bh();
for_each_sk_fl_rcu(np, sfl)
count++;
+ rcu_read_unlock_bh();
if (room <= 0 ||
((count >= FL_MAX_PER_SOCK ||
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists