| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20131206214847.878624138@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 13:52:03 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 32/58] packet: fix use after free race in send path when dev is released
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit e40526cb20b5ee53419452e1f03d97092f144418 ]
Salam reported a use after free bug in PF_PACKET that occurs when
we're sending out frames on a socket bound device and suddenly the
net device is being unregistered. It appears that commit 827d9780
introduced a possible race condition between {t,}packet_snd() and
packet_notifier(). In the case of a bound socket, packet_notifier()
can drop the last reference to the net_device and {t,}packet_snd()
might end up suddenly sending a packet over a freed net_device.
To avoid reverting 827d9780 and thus introducing a performance
regression compared to the current state of things, we decided to
hold a cached RCU protected pointer to the net device and maintain
it on write side via bind spin_lock protected register_prot_hook()
and __unregister_prot_hook() calls.
In {t,}packet_snd() path, we access this pointer under rcu_read_lock
through packet_cached_dev_get() that holds reference to the device
to prevent it from being freed through packet_notifier() while
we're in send path. This is okay to do as dev_put()/dev_hold() are
per-cpu counters, so this should not be a performance issue. Also,
the code simplifies a bit as we don't need need_rls_dev anymore.
Fixes: 827d978037d7 ("af-packet: Use existing netdev reference for bound sockets.")
Reported-by: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Salam Noureddine <noureddine@...stanetworks.com>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
net/packet/internal.h | 1
2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -244,11 +244,15 @@ static void __fanout_link(struct sock *s
static void register_prot_hook(struct sock *sk)
{
struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk);
+
if (!po->running) {
- if (po->fanout)
+ if (po->fanout) {
__fanout_link(sk, po);
- else
+ } else {
dev_add_pack(&po->prot_hook);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(po->cached_dev, po->prot_hook.dev);
+ }
+
sock_hold(sk);
po->running = 1;
}
@@ -266,10 +270,13 @@ static void __unregister_prot_hook(struc
struct packet_sock *po = pkt_sk(sk);
po->running = 0;
- if (po->fanout)
+ if (po->fanout) {
__fanout_unlink(sk, po);
- else
+ } else {
__dev_remove_pack(&po->prot_hook);
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(po->cached_dev, NULL);
+ }
+
__sock_put(sk);
if (sync) {
@@ -2041,12 +2048,24 @@ static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packe
return tp_len;
}
+static struct net_device *packet_cached_dev_get(struct packet_sock *po)
+{
+ struct net_device *dev;
+
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ dev = rcu_dereference(po->cached_dev);
+ if (dev)
+ dev_hold(dev);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+
+ return dev;
+}
+
static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_sock *po, struct msghdr *msg)
{
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct net_device *dev;
__be16 proto;
- bool need_rls_dev = false;
int err, reserve = 0;
void *ph;
struct sockaddr_ll *saddr = (struct sockaddr_ll *)msg->msg_name;
@@ -2059,7 +2078,7 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
mutex_lock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
if (saddr == NULL) {
- dev = po->prot_hook.dev;
+ dev = packet_cached_dev_get(po);
proto = po->num;
addr = NULL;
} else {
@@ -2073,19 +2092,17 @@ static int tpacket_snd(struct packet_soc
proto = saddr->sll_protocol;
addr = saddr->sll_addr;
dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(&po->sk), saddr->sll_ifindex);
- need_rls_dev = true;
}
err = -ENXIO;
if (unlikely(dev == NULL))
goto out;
-
- reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
-
err = -ENETDOWN;
if (unlikely(!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
goto out_put;
+ reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
+
size_max = po->tx_ring.frame_size
- (po->tp_hdrlen - sizeof(struct sockaddr_ll));
@@ -2162,8 +2179,7 @@ out_status:
__packet_set_status(po, ph, status);
kfree_skb(skb);
out_put:
- if (need_rls_dev)
- dev_put(dev);
+ dev_put(dev);
out:
mutex_unlock(&po->pg_vec_lock);
return err;
@@ -2201,7 +2217,6 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *soc
struct sk_buff *skb;
struct net_device *dev;
__be16 proto;
- bool need_rls_dev = false;
unsigned char *addr;
int err, reserve = 0;
struct virtio_net_hdr vnet_hdr = { 0 };
@@ -2217,7 +2232,7 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *soc
*/
if (saddr == NULL) {
- dev = po->prot_hook.dev;
+ dev = packet_cached_dev_get(po);
proto = po->num;
addr = NULL;
} else {
@@ -2229,19 +2244,17 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *soc
proto = saddr->sll_protocol;
addr = saddr->sll_addr;
dev = dev_get_by_index(sock_net(sk), saddr->sll_ifindex);
- need_rls_dev = true;
}
err = -ENXIO;
- if (dev == NULL)
+ if (unlikely(dev == NULL))
goto out_unlock;
- if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW)
- reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
-
err = -ENETDOWN;
- if (!(dev->flags & IFF_UP))
+ if (unlikely(!(dev->flags & IFF_UP)))
goto out_unlock;
+ if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW)
+ reserve = dev->hard_header_len;
if (po->has_vnet_hdr) {
vnet_hdr_len = sizeof(vnet_hdr);
@@ -2375,15 +2388,14 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *soc
if (err > 0 && (err = net_xmit_errno(err)) != 0)
goto out_unlock;
- if (need_rls_dev)
- dev_put(dev);
+ dev_put(dev);
return len;
out_free:
kfree_skb(skb);
out_unlock:
- if (dev && need_rls_dev)
+ if (dev)
dev_put(dev);
out:
return err;
@@ -2603,6 +2615,7 @@ static int packet_create(struct net *net
po = pkt_sk(sk);
sk->sk_family = PF_PACKET;
po->num = proto;
+ RCU_INIT_POINTER(po->cached_dev, NULL);
sk->sk_destruct = packet_sock_destruct;
sk_refcnt_debug_inc(sk);
--- a/net/packet/internal.h
+++ b/net/packet/internal.h
@@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ struct packet_sock {
unsigned int tp_loss:1;
unsigned int tp_tx_has_off:1;
unsigned int tp_tstamp;
+ struct net_device __rcu *cached_dev;
struct packet_type prot_hook ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
};
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists