| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20131207231756.GA28915@kroah.com> Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 15:17:56 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, stable@...r.kernel.org, "shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 00/83] 3.12.4-stable review On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 03:15:17PM -0700, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 12/06/2013 02:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.12.4 release. > >There are 83 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >let me know. > > > >Responses should be made by Sun Dec 8 21:44:41 UTC 2013. > >Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > >The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: > > kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.12.4-rc1.gz > >and the diffstat can be found below. > > > >thanks, > > > >greg k-h > > patch applied cleanly. > Compile testing - passed > Boot testing - passed > dmesg regression testing - passed > dmesgs look good. No regressions compared to the previous dmesgs for > this release. dmesg emerg, crit, alert, err are clean. No > regressions in warn. Thanks for testing all three of these -rc releases. greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists