[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131208144312.GC4338@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 8 Dec 2013 15:43:12 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Rui Wang <ruiv.wang@...il.com>
Cc: lance.ortiz@...com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, lance_ortiz@...mail.com,
jiang.liu@...el.com, tony.luck@...el.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
m.chehab@...sung.com, Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aerdrv: Fix severity usage in aer trace event
On Sun, Dec 08, 2013 at 12:17:53PM +0800, Rui Wang wrote:
> There's inconsistency between dmesg and the trace event output.
> When dmesg says "severity=Corrected", the trace event says
> "severity=Fatal". What happens is that HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED is
> defined in edac.h:
>
> enum hw_event_mc_err_type {
> HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED,
> HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED,
> HW_EVENT_ERR_FATAL,
> HW_EVENT_ERR_INFO,
> };
>
> while aer_print_error() uses aer_error_severity_string[] defined as:
>
> static const char *aer_error_severity_string[] = {
> "Uncorrected (Non-Fatal)",
> "Uncorrected (Fatal)",
> "Corrected"
> };
>
> In this case dmesg is correct because info->severity is assigned in
> aer_isr_one_error() using the definitions in include/linux/ras.h:
>
> Signed-off-by: Rui Wang <rui.y.wang@...el.com>
Applied, thanks.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists