[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386478624.4748.19.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Sun, 08 Dec 2013 05:57:04 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Eder <jeder@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: 50 Watt idle power regression bisected to Linux-3.10
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 03:00 -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
>
> An idle WSM-EX box (40 Xeon cores) runs 50 Watts hotter after this patch:
>
> commit 7d1a941731fabf27e5fb6edbebb79fe856edb4e5
> Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Date: Thu Mar 21 22:50:03 2013 +0100
>
> x86: Use generic idle loop
>
> ie. the commit before this patch (aba92c9e2cf3042bf6efc68fa2e4235ba01bf499)
> runs at 50 watts less, as do Linux 3.7, 3.8 and 3.9.
>
> The difference is that the good kernels allow about 98% residence
> in the package C6 state, while the bad kernel is so noisy that it
> gets into pc6 0% of the time.
> (indeed, even core C6 is reduced to about 50% from over 99%)
FWIW, my little x3550 (E5620) box is spending ~99% of its time in C3 per
powertop, deepest state it has. It took a big hit from 69a37bea as well
as 7d1a9417, but with revert of 69a37bea, and addition of ea811747, it's
fairly close to 3.7 in fastpath weight, and greenery _seems_ fine.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists