linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: TIDSPBRIDGE: Remove UUID helper

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131208071857.GA12104@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Dec 2013 23:18:57 -0800
From:	"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Ivajlo Dimitrov <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@...il.com>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@....bg>, pavel@....cz,
	pali.rohar@...il.com, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: TIDSPBRIDGE: Remove UUID helper

On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 10:41:36AM +0200, Ivajlo Dimitrov wrote:
> 
> On 06.12.2013 17:10, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 08:05:38AM +0200, Ivajlo Dimitrov wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> On 01.12.2013 19:07, Ivaylo DImitrov wrote:
> >>> From: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@....bg>
> >>>
> >>> Custom uuid helper function is needed only in rmgr/dbdcd.c and doesn't
> >>> need to be exported. It can also be made way simpler by using sscanf.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov <freemangordon@....bg>
> >>> ---
> >>>    drivers/staging/tidspbridge/Makefile               |    2 +-
> >>>    drivers/staging/tidspbridge/gen/uuidutil.c         |   85 --------------------
> >>>    .../tidspbridge/include/dspbridge/uuidutil.h       |   18 ----
> >>>    drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/dbdcd.c           |   42 +++++++++-
> >>>    4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 108 deletions(-)
> >>>    delete mode 100644 drivers/staging/tidspbridge/gen/uuidutil.c
> >>>
> >> I guess the initial mail somehow didn't make it through your spam filter:
> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/12/1/70
> > It did, but I thought that people asked for it to be changed in the
> > thread afterwards, so I was expecting an updated version from you.
> >
> > Care to fix things up and resend it?
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> Sure, the change I was asked for is trivial, but I didn't get the reason 
> why it is needed. Neither there is a reply to my follow-up comment [0]. 
> Sorry, I am pretty much new on LKML and could miss things that are 
> supposed to be clear from the start, but my impression is that when 
> someone says "it is better", he/she should explain why it is better or 
> at least what is wrong with the patch he/she wants  to be changed.
> 
> However, I don't want to enter some arguing loop, so if you think I 
> should change the code as per Joe's comment, just confirm it and I'll do it.

Please try.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/