linux-kernel - Re: [RFC part2 PATCH 2/9] ARM64 / ACPI: Prefill cpu possible/present maps and map logical cpu id to APIC id

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A57A17.40400@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:06:47 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linaro Patches <patches@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC part2 PATCH 2/9] ARM64 / ACPI: Prefill cpu possible/present
 maps and map logical cpu id to APIC id

On 2013-12-6 7:09, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 December 2013, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> index a0c2ca6..1428024 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/smp.c
>>> @@ -420,7 +420,9 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>>>                 if (err)
>>>                         continue;
>>>
>>> +#ifndef CONFIG_ACPI
>>>                 set_cpu_present(cpu, true);
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Should this be moved to DT cpu topology related code?
> 
> More importantly, the #ifndef is certainly wrong here: It is important that you can
> turn CONFIG_ACPI on or off without impacting the run-time code path for non-ACPI
> systems. The snippet above breaks this because we no longer set the
> cpu mask when ACPI is turned on but not used.

Good point, I'll rework this patch to find a better solution.

Thanks for your comments.

Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/