linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the driver-core.current tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131209082152.GA26809@kroah.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 00:21:52 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the
 driver-core.current tree

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 02:47:12PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in
> fs/sysfs/file.c between commit a8b14744429f ("sysfs: give different
> locking key to regular and bin files") from the driver-core.current tree
> and commit 414985ae23c0 ("sysfs, kernfs: move file core code to
> fs/kernfs/file.c") (among others) from the driver-core tree.
> 
> I just dropped the driver-core.current tree commit as I don't see what
> needs to be done after the other changes in the driver-core tree.

Tejun said he would provide a merge fixup as we knew this was going to
be a problem :)

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/