[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1386585509-12495-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 11:38:29 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: pinconf: remove checks on ops->pin_config_get
ops->pin_config_get() is only used in one specific path that will only be taken
for generic pinconf drivers (ops->is_generic == true) when dumping the pinconf
by using debugfs.
By removing the check in pinconf_check_ops(), let's stop pressuring people to
write a pin_config_get() function that will never be used and so will probably
never be tested.
Removing the check in pinconf_pins_show() allows driver to not implement
pin_config_get() but still get a dump of the pinconf in debugfs by implementing
pin_config_dbg_show().
Finally, not implementing pin_config_get() now results in returning -ENOTSUPP
instead of -EINVAL. While this doesn't have any real impact for now, this feels
more right.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c | 20 ++++----------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c
index b8fcc38c0d11..4187fe58794d 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinconf.c
@@ -28,12 +28,6 @@ int pinconf_check_ops(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev)
{
const struct pinconf_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->confops;
- /* We must be able to read out pin status */
- if (!ops->pin_config_get && !ops->pin_config_group_get) {
- dev_err(pctldev->dev,
- "pinconf must be able to read out pin status\n");
- return -EINVAL;
- }
/* We have to be able to config the pins in SOME way */
if (!ops->pin_config_set && !ops->pin_config_group_set) {
dev_err(pctldev->dev,
@@ -67,9 +61,9 @@ int pin_config_get_for_pin(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin,
const struct pinconf_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->confops;
if (!ops || !ops->pin_config_get) {
- dev_err(pctldev->dev, "cannot get pin configuration, missing "
+ dev_dbg(pctldev->dev, "cannot get pin configuration, missing "
"pin_config_get() function in driver\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ return -ENOTSUPP;
}
return ops->pin_config_get(pctldev, pin, config);
@@ -93,10 +87,10 @@ int pin_config_group_get(const char *dev_name, const char *pin_group,
ops = pctldev->desc->confops;
if (!ops || !ops->pin_config_group_get) {
- dev_err(pctldev->dev, "cannot get configuration for pin "
+ dev_dbg(pctldev->dev, "cannot get configuration for pin "
"group, missing group config get function in "
"driver\n");
- ret = -EINVAL;
+ ret = -ENOTSUPP;
goto unlock;
}
@@ -305,9 +299,6 @@ static int pinconf_pins_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
const struct pinconf_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->confops;
unsigned i, pin;
- if (!ops || !ops->pin_config_get)
- return 0;
-
seq_puts(s, "Pin config settings per pin\n");
seq_puts(s, "Format: pin (name): configs\n");
@@ -356,9 +347,6 @@ static int pinconf_groups_show(struct seq_file *s, void *what)
unsigned ngroups = pctlops->get_groups_count(pctldev);
unsigned selector = 0;
- if (!ops || !ops->pin_config_group_get)
- return 0;
-
seq_puts(s, "Pin config settings per pin group\n");
seq_puts(s, "Format: group (name): configs\n");
--
1.8.3.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists