[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <2699941.H5LXh5yo1R@amdc1227>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 13:48:13 +0100
From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
To: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, naveenkrishna.ch@...il.com,
rui.zhang@...el.com, eduardo.valentin@...com,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
amit.daniel@...sung.com, kgene.kim@...sung.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, b.zolnierkie@...sung.com,
cpgs@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4 v10] thermal: samsung: change base_common to more
meaningful base_second
Hi Naveen,
On Tuesday 19 of November 2013 18:34:51 Naveen Krishna Chatradhi wrote:
> On Exynos5440 and Exynos5420 there are registers common
> across the TMU channels.
>
> To support that, we introduced a ADDRESS_MULTIPLE flag in the
> driver and the 2nd set of register base and size are provided
> in the "reg" property of the node.
>
> As per Amit's suggestion, this patch changes the base_common
> to base_second and SHARED_MEMORY to ADDRESS_MULTIPLE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@...sung.com>
> Acked-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
> ---
> Changes since v9:
> Just respinning
>
> Changes since v8:
> None
> .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt | 4 ++--
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c | 14 +++++++-------
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu_data.c | 2 +-
> 4 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Please see my comments inline.
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> index 284f530..116cca0 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt
> @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@
> - reg : Address range of the thermal registers. For soc's which has multiple
> instances of TMU and some registers are shared across all TMU's like
> interrupt related then 2 set of register has to supplied. First set
> - belongs to each instance of TMU and second set belongs to common TMU
> - registers.
> + belongs to each instance of TMU and second set belongs to second set
> + of common TMU registers.
Just a wording issue, I think: If this is "second set of common TMU
registers", then where is the first set of common TMU registers?
Otherwise the patch looks fine.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists