[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r49m8112.fsf@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 08:03:21 -0800
From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To: Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@...il.com>
Cc: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, santosh.shilimkar@...com,
linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...mide.com, balbi@...com,
nm@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT/PATCH V3] gpio: omap: refresh patch "be more aggressive with pm_runtime" against v3.12-rc5
Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@...il.com> writes:
> From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
>
> try to keep gpio block suspended as much as possible.
> Tested with pandaboard and a sysfs exported gpio.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi at ti.com>
>
> [caesarxuchao@...il.com : Refreshed against v3.12-rc5, and added
> revision check to enable aggressive pm_runtime on OMAP4-only. Because
> am33xx_gpio_sysc.idlemodes seems to be wrongly marked as
> SIDLE_SMART_WKUP, which might cause missed interrupts with this patch.
> Tested on Pandaboard rev A2.]
> Signed-off-by: Chao Xu <caesarxuchao@...il.com>
I have several problems with this patch.
First, the changelog is missing a lot of information. In particular, nowhere
is it described what problem is this patch addressing and how this
patch addresses that problem.
Second, I don't see any mention of off-mode, and I suspect there are
issues with off-mode here that are not being addressed.
Also, I *really* don't like any approach that is targetted at a single
SoC.
Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists