[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A5EC3E.2050301@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 11:13:50 -0500
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] mm: numa: Defer TLB flush for THP migration as
long as possible
On 12/09/2013 02:09 AM, Mel Gorman wrote:
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index cfb4190..5372521 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -1759,6 +1759,12 @@ int migrate_misplaced_transhuge_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> goto out_fail;
> }
>
> + /* PTL provides a memory barrier with change_protection_range */
> + ptl = pmd_lock(mm, pmd);
> + if (tlb_flush_pending(mm))
> + flush_tlb_range(vma, mmun_start, mmun_end);
> + spin_unlock(ptl);
> +
> /* Prepare a page as a migration target */
> __set_page_locked(new_page);
> SetPageSwapBacked(new_page);
I don't think there is a need for that extra memory barrier.
On the "set_tlb_flush_pending, turn ptes into NUMA ones" side, we
have a barrier in the form of the page table lock.
We only end up in this code path if the pte/pmd already is a NUMA
one, and we take several spinlocks along the way to doing this test.
That provides for the memory barrier in this code path.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists