[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131209170002.GA15223@sonymobile.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:00:02 -0800
From: Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>
To: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
CC: "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"cjb@...top.org" <cjb@...top.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"pawel.moll@....com" <pawel.moll@....com>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"swarren@...dotorg.org" <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
"ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk" <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
"galak@...eaurora.org" <galak@...eaurora.org>,
"rob@...dley.net" <rob@...dley.net>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"subhashj@...eaurora.org" <subhashj@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] mmc: sdhci-msm: Initial support for MSM chipsets
On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 04:56:45PM +0100, Georgi Djakov wrote:
> This platform driver adds the initial support of Secure
> Digital Host Controller Interface compliant controller
> found in Qualcomm MSM chipsets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Georgi Djakov <gdjakov@...sol.com>
[...]
> +static int sdhci_msm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_host *host;
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
> + struct sdhci_msm_host *msm_host;
> + struct resource *core_memres = NULL;
> + int ret, dead;
> + u16 host_version;
> + u32 irq_status, irq_ctl;
> +
> + if (!pdev->dev.of_node) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No device tree data\n");
> + return -ENOENT;
> + }
> +
> + msm_host = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*msm_host), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!msm_host)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + msm_host->sdhci_msm_pdata.ops = &sdhci_msm_ops;
> + host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, &msm_host->sdhci_msm_pdata, 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(host)) {
> + dev_err(mmc_dev(host->mmc), "sdhci_pltfm_init error\n");
> + return PTR_ERR(host);
> + }
> +
> + pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + pltfm_host->priv = msm_host;
> + msm_host->mmc = host->mmc;
> + msm_host->pdev = pdev;
> +
> + ret = mmc_of_parse(host->mmc);
Can we please add a call to sdhci_get_of_property(pdev) somewhere around
here too?
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed parsing mmc device tree\n");
> + goto pltfm_free;
> + }
> +
> + ret = sdhci_msm_populate_pdata(&pdev->dev, &msm_host->pdata);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "DT parsing error\n");
> + goto pltfm_free;
> + }
> +
> + /* Setup SDCC bus voter clock. */
> + msm_host->bus_clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "bus");
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk)) {
> + /* Vote for max. clk rate for max. performance */
> + ret = clk_set_rate(msm_host->bus_clk, INT_MAX);
> + if (ret)
> + goto pltfm_free;
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(msm_host->bus_clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto pltfm_free;
> + }
> +
> + /* Setup main peripheral bus clock */
> + msm_host->pclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "iface");
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->pclk)) {
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(msm_host->pclk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Main peripheral clock setup fail (%d)\n",
> + ret);
> + goto bus_clk_disable;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* Setup SDC MMC clock */
> + msm_host->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "core");
> + if (IS_ERR(msm_host->clk)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->clk);
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "SDC MMC clock setup fail (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto pclk_disable;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(msm_host->clk);
> + if (ret)
> + goto pclk_disable;
> +
> + /* Setup regulators */
> + ret = sdhci_msm_vreg_init(&pdev->dev, &msm_host->pdata);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Regulator setup fail (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto clk_disable;
> + }
> +
> + core_memres = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> + IORESOURCE_MEM, "core_mem");
> + msm_host->core_mem = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, core_memres);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(msm_host->core_mem)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to remap registers\n");
> + ret = PTR_ERR(msm_host->core_mem);
> + goto vreg_disable;
> + }
> +
> + /* Reset the core and Enable SDHC mode */
> + writel_relaxed(readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_POWER) |
> + CORE_SW_RST, msm_host->core_mem + CORE_POWER);
> +
> + /* SW reset can take upto 10HCLK + 15MCLK cycles. (min 40us) */
> + usleep_range(1000, 5000);
> + if (readl(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_POWER) & CORE_SW_RST) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Stuck in reset\n");
> + ret = -ETIMEDOUT;
> + goto vreg_disable;
> + }
> +
> + /* Set HC_MODE_EN bit in HC_MODE register */
> + writel_relaxed(HC_MODE_EN, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_HC_MODE));
> +
> + /*
> + * CORE_SW_RST above may trigger power irq if previous status of PWRCTL
> + * was either BUS_ON or IO_HIGH_V. So before we enable the power irq
> + * interrupt in GIC (by registering the interrupt handler), we need to
> + * ensure that any pending power irq interrupt status is acknowledged
> + * otherwise power irq interrupt handler would be fired prematurely.
> + */
> + irq_status = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_STATUS);
> + writel_relaxed(irq_status, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CLEAR));
> + irq_ctl = readl_relaxed(msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL);
> + if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_ON | CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_OFF))
> + irq_ctl |= CORE_PWRCTL_BUS_SUCCESS;
> + if (irq_status & (CORE_PWRCTL_IO_HIGH | CORE_PWRCTL_IO_LOW))
> + irq_ctl |= CORE_PWRCTL_IO_SUCCESS;
> + writel_relaxed(irq_ctl, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_CTL));
> + /*
> + * Ensure that above writes are propogated before interrupt enablement
> + * in GIC.
> + */
> + mb();
> +
> + /*
> + * Following are the deviations from SDHC spec v3.0 -
> + * 1. Card detection is handled using separate GPIO.
> + * 2. Bus power control is handled by interacting with PMIC.
> + */
> + host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION;
> + host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_SINGLE_POWER_WRITE;
I couldn't get v6 running without the 5 quirks you submitted in [1].
Aren't these also attributes of the controller itself? If so, shouldn't they
be part of this patch series, and included here?
> + host_version = readw_relaxed((host->ioaddr + SDHCI_HOST_VERSION));
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "Host Version: 0x%x Vendor Version 0x%x\n",
> + host_version, ((host_version & SDHCI_VENDOR_VER_MASK) >>
> + SDHCI_VENDOR_VER_SHIFT));
> +
> + /* Setup PWRCTL irq */
> + msm_host->pwr_irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "pwr_irq");
> + if (msm_host->pwr_irq < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to get pwr_irq by name (%d)\n",
> + msm_host->pwr_irq);
> + goto vreg_disable;
> + }
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, msm_host->pwr_irq, NULL,
> + sdhci_msm_pwr_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
> + dev_name(&pdev->dev), host);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Request threaded irq(%d) fail (%d)\n",
> + msm_host->pwr_irq, ret);
> + goto vreg_disable;
> + }
> +
> + /* Enable pwr irq interrupts */
> + writel_relaxed(INT_MASK, (msm_host->core_mem + CORE_PWRCTL_MASK));
> +
> + msm_host->mmc->caps |= msm_host->pdata.caps;
> + msm_host->mmc->caps2 |= msm_host->pdata.caps2;
> +
> + ret = sdhci_add_host(host);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Add host fail (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto vreg_disable;
> + }
> +
> + ret = clk_set_rate(msm_host->clk, host->max_clk);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "MClk rate set fail (%d)\n", ret);
> + goto remove_host;
> + }
> +
> + host->mmc->max_current_180 = host->mmc->max_current_300 =
> + host->mmc->max_current_330 = sdhci_msm_get_vdd_max_current(msm_host);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +remove_host:
> + dead = (readl_relaxed(host->ioaddr + SDHCI_INT_STATUS) == 0xffffffff);
> + sdhci_remove_host(host, dead);
> +vreg_disable:
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->pdata.vdd.reg))
> + sdhci_msm_vreg_disable(&pdev->dev, &msm_host->pdata.vdd);
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->pdata.vdd_io.reg))
> + sdhci_msm_vreg_disable(&pdev->dev, &msm_host->pdata.vdd_io);
> +clk_disable:
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->clk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(msm_host->clk);
> +pclk_disable:
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->pclk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(msm_host->pclk);
> +bus_clk_disable:
> + if (!IS_ERR(msm_host->bus_clk))
> + clk_disable_unprepare(msm_host->bus_clk);
> +pltfm_free:
> + sdhci_pltfm_free(pdev);
> + return ret;
> +}
-Courtney
[1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/15/254
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists