[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131209120450.4da43296@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:04:50 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Sandeepa Prabhu <sandeepa.prabhu@...aro.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, x86@...nel.org,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, systemtap@...rceware.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip v5 12/18] ftrace/kprobes: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL macro
in ftrace
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:47:46 +0000
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com> wrote:
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace_probe.h
> @@ -124,8 +124,8 @@ struct probe_arg {
> const struct fetch_type *type; /* Type of this argument */
> };
>
> -static inline __kprobes void call_fetch(struct fetch_param *fprm,
> - struct pt_regs *regs, void *dest)
> +static inline void call_fetch(struct fetch_param *fprm,
> + struct pt_regs *regs, void *dest)
> {
> return fprm->fn(regs, fprm->data, dest);
> }
>
Is this OK to be probed? I've had cases where a header "static inline"
was not always inlined. Unless you have "__always_inline" this is not
guaranteed to be inlined.
As for the rest of the patch:
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists