[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131209183927.GB28986@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 10:39:27 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: konrad.wilk@...cle.com, raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] xen/debugfs: Check debugfs initialization before
using it
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 09:49:36PM +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:56:52PM +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote:
> >> From: "ethan.zhao" <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
> >>
> >> Should check debugfs initialization with debugfs_initialized() before using it,
> >> Because if it isn't initialized, the return value of fake debugfs_create_dir() etc
> >> functions would be ERR_PTR(-ENODEV), checking with NULL will not work.
> >>
> >> V3: add warning message when debugfs not configured or disabled.
> >
> > That's not what this patch does...
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: ethan.zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/xen/debugfs.c | 6 ++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/debugfs.c b/arch/x86/xen/debugfs.c
> >> index c8377fb..85c0e0e 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/xen/debugfs.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/debugfs.c
> >> @@ -9,12 +9,18 @@ static struct dentry *d_xen_debug;
> >>
> >> struct dentry * __init xen_init_debugfs(void)
> >> {
> >> + if (!debugfs_initialized()) {
> >> + d_xen_debug = NULL;
> >> + goto nodebugfs;
> >> + }
> >
> > Again, why is this even needed?
> >
> > What problem in the existing code are you trying to solve?
> >
> What I want to ask who is so smart and fake some many functions when
> CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is not configured/defined and the build could pass
> without any error ?
That's the way this has always worked.
> What is the motive make him wrote some many fake function and why he
> wrote the debugfs_initialized() function seem 'useless' at all ?
To make the caller code easier, and smaller, and to not care if debugfs
is enabled in the kernel build or not at all.
Ok, I answered your questions, now care to answer mine?
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists