[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1312092154350.24835@pobox.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 21:57:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, H.J. Lu wrote:
> Normally, a PIE executable has zero virtual address on the first PT_LOAD
> segment and kernel will load such executable at random address when
> randomization is enabled. If randomization is disabled, kernel will load
> it at a fixed address. But if a PIE executable has non-zero virtual
> address on the first PT_LOAD segment, kernel will load such executable
> at the non-zero virtual address when randomization is enabled. But when
> randomization is disabled, kernel ignores the non-zero virtual address
> at the non-zero virtual address when randomization is enabled.
Hmm ... isn't actually this the thing that needs to be fixed instead?
IOW, when randomization is enabled, is there a reason not to load on
randomized address? (even if the first PT_LOAD segment has non-zero
vaddr?)
> But when randomization is disabled, kernel ignores the non-zero virtual
> address on the first PT_LOAD segment and loads it at the fixed address.
> This patch makes kernel consistent by loading PIE executable with
> non-zero virtual address at the non-zero virtual address, regardless if
> randomization is enabled or disabled.
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists