linux-kernel - RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3 V2] f2fs: introduce f2fs_cache_node_page() to add page into node

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1386566386.2101.99.camel@kjgkr>
Date:	Mon, 09 Dec 2013 14:19:46 +0900
From:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
To:	Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
Cc:	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3 V2] f2fs: introduce f2fs_cache_node_page()
 to add page into node_inode cache

2013-12-09 (월), 10:14 +0800, Chao Yu:
> Hi,
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com]
> > Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 7:37 AM
> > To: Chao Yu
> > Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3 V2] f2fs: introduce f2fs_cache_node_page() to add page into node_inode cache
> > 
> > 2013-12-06 (금), 17:10 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > This patch introduces f2fs_cache_node_page(), in this function, page which is
> > > readed ahead will be copy to node_inode's mapping cache.
> > > It will avoid rereading these node pages.
> > >
> > > change log:
> > >  o check validity of grabbed page suggested by Jaegeuk Kim.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@...sung.com>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/f2fs/node.c |   35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > index 099f06f..3ff98fa 100644
> > > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > > @@ -1600,6 +1600,39 @@ static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
> > >  	return 0;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * f2fs_cache_node_page() copy updated page data to node_inode cache page.
> > > + */
> > > +void f2fs_cache_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
> > > +						nid_t nid)
> > > +{
> > > +	struct address_space *mapping = sbi->node_inode->i_mapping;
> > > +	struct page *npage;
> > 
> > 
> > What I meant for the validity was to check the block address to figure
> > out this node page is up-to-date or not.
> > IOW, something like this.
> 
> Yes, you're right.
> 
> So, how about the this one?
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/node.c |   39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index 099f06f..3e7a336 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1600,13 +1600,46 @@ static int ra_sum_pages(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct list_head *pages,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * f2fs_cache_node_page() check validaty of input page by searching NAT.
> + * Then, it will copy updated data of vaild page to node_inode cache.
> + */
> +void f2fs_cache_node_page(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, struct page *page,
> +						nid_t nid, block_t blkaddr)
> +{
> +	struct address_space *mapping = sbi->node_inode->i_mapping;
> +	struct page *npage;
> +	struct node_info ni;
> +
> +	get_node_info(sbi, nid, &ni);
> +
> +	if (ni.blk_addr != blkaddr)
> +		return;
> +
> +	npage = grab_cache_page(mapping, nid);
> +	if (!npage)

	if (unlikely(!npage))

Could you submit a v3?
Thanks,

> +		return;
> +
> +	if (PageUptodate(npage)) {
> +		f2fs_put_page(npage, 1);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	memcpy(page_address(npage), page_address(page), PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
> +
> +	SetPageUptodate(npage);
> +	f2fs_put_page(npage, 1);
> +
> +	return;
> +}
> +
>  int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  			unsigned int segno, struct f2fs_summary_block *sum)
>  {
>  	struct f2fs_node *rn;
>  	struct f2fs_summary *sum_entry;
>  	struct page *page, *tmp;
> -	block_t addr;
> +	block_t addr, blkaddr;
>  	int bio_blocks = MAX_BIO_BLOCKS(max_hw_blocks(sbi));
>  	int i, last_offset, nrpages, err = 0;
>  	LIST_HEAD(page_list);
> @@ -1624,6 +1657,7 @@ int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  		if (err)
>  			return err;
>  
> +		blkaddr = addr;
>  		list_for_each_entry_safe(page, tmp, &page_list, lru) {
>  
>  			lock_page(page);
> @@ -1633,6 +1667,8 @@ int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  				sum_entry->version = 0;
>  				sum_entry->ofs_in_node = 0;
>  				sum_entry++;
> +				f2fs_cache_node_page(sbi, page,
> +					le32_to_cpu(rn->footer.nid), blkaddr);
>  			} else {
>  				err = -EIO;
>  			}
> @@ -1640,6 +1676,7 @@ int restore_node_summary(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
>  			list_del(&page->lru);
>  			unlock_page(page);
>  			__free_pages(page, 0);
> +			blkaddr++;
>  		}
>  	}
>  	return err;

-- 
Jaegeuk Kim
Samsung

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/