linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:52:25 -0800
From:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled

On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:49 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>>> PT_LOAD being non-zero causing randomization to be turned off seems like
>>> quite unexpected behavior to me, with a great potential to cause a lot of
>>> confusion.
>>
>> There should be no difference between dynamic executable and PIE
>> with non-zero vaddr when choosing where to load them.
>>
>
> Why is that?  It would seem to be a big difference between a relocatable
> binary (PIE) and one with a load address fixed at link time.
>

PIE with non-zero vaddr should be loaded at non-zero
vaddr.  Otherwise, PIE may not work as expected.


-- 
H.J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/