| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1386625856-12942-8-git-send-email-santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 16:50:40 -0500
From: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 07/23] mm/memblock: switch to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of MAX_NUMNODES
From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
It's recommended to use NUMA_NO_NODE everywhere to select
"process any node" behavior or to indicate that "no node id specified".
Hence, update __next_free_mem_range*() API's to accept both NUMA_NO_NODE
and MAX_NUMNODES, but emit warning once on MAX_NUMNODES, and correct
corresponding API's documentation to describe new behavior.
Also, update other memblock/nobootmem APIs where MAX_NUMNODES is used
dirrectly.
The change was suggested by Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>.
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++--
mm/memblock.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
mm/nobootmem.c | 8 ++++----
3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index dca4533..8607429 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ void __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid, phys_addr_t *out_start,
/**
* for_each_free_mem_range - iterate through free memblock areas
* @i: u64 used as loop variable
- * @nid: node selector, %MAX_NUMNODES for all nodes
+ * @nid: node selector, %NUMA_NO_NODE for all nodes
* @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ void __next_free_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid, phys_addr_t *out_start,
/**
* for_each_free_mem_range_reverse - rev-iterate through free memblock areas
* @i: u64 used as loop variable
- * @nid: node selector, %MAX_NUMNODES for all nodes
+ * @nid: node selector, %NUMA_NO_NODE for all nodes
* @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL
diff --git a/mm/memblock.c b/mm/memblock.c
index 8786503..900057b 100644
--- a/mm/memblock.c
+++ b/mm/memblock.c
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static long __init_memblock memblock_overlaps_region(struct memblock_type *type,
* @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
* @size: size of free area to find
* @align: alignment of free area to find
- * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
+ * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %NUMA_NO_NODE for any node
*
* Utility called from memblock_find_in_range_node(), find free area bottom-up.
*
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ __memblock_find_range_bottom_up(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
* @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
* @size: size of free area to find
* @align: alignment of free area to find
- * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
+ * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %NUMA_NO_NODE for any node
*
* Utility called from memblock_find_in_range_node(), find free area top-down.
*
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ __memblock_find_range_top_down(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end,
* @align: alignment of free area to find
* @start: start of candidate range
* @end: end of candidate range, can be %MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_{ANYWHERE|ACCESSIBLE}
- * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %MAX_NUMNODES for any node
+ * @nid: nid of the free area to find, %NUMA_NO_NODE for any node
*
* Find @size free area aligned to @align in the specified range and node.
*
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init_memblock memblock_find_in_range(phys_addr_t start,
phys_addr_t align)
{
return memblock_find_in_range_node(size, align, start, end,
- MAX_NUMNODES);
+ NUMA_NO_NODE);
}
static void __init_memblock memblock_remove_region(struct memblock_type *type, unsigned long r)
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ int __init_memblock memblock_reserve(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size)
/**
* __next_free_mem_range - next function for for_each_free_mem_range()
* @idx: pointer to u64 loop variable
- * @nid: node selector, %MAX_NUMNODES for all nodes
+ * @nid: node selector, %NUMA_NO_NODE for all nodes
* @out_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @out_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
* @out_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL
@@ -705,6 +705,11 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid,
struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved;
int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff;
int ri = *idx >> 32;
+ bool check_node = (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) && (nid != MAX_NUMNODES);
+
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
+ pr_warn_once("%s: Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is depricated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead\n",
+ __func__);
for ( ; mi < mem->cnt; mi++) {
struct memblock_region *m = &mem->regions[mi];
@@ -712,7 +717,7 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid,
phys_addr_t m_end = m->base + m->size;
/* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */
- if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m))
+ if (check_node && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m))
continue;
/* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */
@@ -753,7 +758,7 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range(u64 *idx, int nid,
/**
* __next_free_mem_range_rev - next function for for_each_free_mem_range_reverse()
* @idx: pointer to u64 loop variable
- * @nid: nid: node selector, %MAX_NUMNODES for all nodes
+ * @nid: nid: node selector, %NUMA_NO_NODE for all nodes
* @out_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @out_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
* @out_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL
@@ -768,6 +773,11 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid,
struct memblock_type *rsv = &memblock.reserved;
int mi = *idx & 0xffffffff;
int ri = *idx >> 32;
+ bool check_node = (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE) && (nid != MAX_NUMNODES);
+
+ if (nid == MAX_NUMNODES)
+ pr_warn_once("%s: Usage of MAX_NUMNODES is depricated. Use NUMA_NO_NODE instead\n",
+ __func__);
if (*idx == (u64)ULLONG_MAX) {
mi = mem->cnt - 1;
@@ -780,7 +790,7 @@ void __init_memblock __next_free_mem_range_rev(u64 *idx, int nid,
phys_addr_t m_end = m->base + m->size;
/* only memory regions are associated with nodes, check it */
- if (nid != MAX_NUMNODES && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m))
+ if (check_node && nid != memblock_get_region_node(m))
continue;
/* scan areas before each reservation for intersection */
@@ -903,7 +913,7 @@ phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_nid(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, int n
phys_addr_t __init __memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr)
{
- return memblock_alloc_base_nid(size, align, max_addr, MAX_NUMNODES);
+ return memblock_alloc_base_nid(size, align, max_addr, NUMA_NO_NODE);
}
phys_addr_t __init memblock_alloc_base(phys_addr_t size, phys_addr_t align, phys_addr_t max_addr)
diff --git a/mm/nobootmem.c b/mm/nobootmem.c
index 59777e0..19121ce 100644
--- a/mm/nobootmem.c
+++ b/mm/nobootmem.c
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ static unsigned long __init free_low_memory_core_early(void)
phys_addr_t start, end, size;
u64 i;
- for_each_free_mem_range(i, MAX_NUMNODES, &start, &end, NULL)
+ for_each_free_mem_range(i, NUMA_NO_NODE, &start, &end, NULL)
count += __free_memory_core(start, end);
/* free range that is used for reserved array if we allocate it */
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ unsigned long __init free_all_bootmem(void)
reset_all_zones_managed_pages();
/*
- * We need to use MAX_NUMNODES instead of NODE_DATA(0)->node_id
+ * We need to use NUMA_NO_NODE instead of NODE_DATA(0)->node_id
* because in some case like Node0 doesn't have RAM installed
* low ram will be on Node1
*/
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static void * __init ___alloc_bootmem_nopanic(unsigned long size,
restart:
- ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(MAX_NUMNODES, size, align, goal, limit);
+ ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(NUMA_NO_NODE, size, align, goal, limit);
if (ptr)
return ptr;
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ again:
if (ptr)
return ptr;
- ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(MAX_NUMNODES, size, align,
+ ptr = __alloc_memory_core_early(NUMA_NO_NODE, size, align,
goal, limit);
if (ptr)
return ptr;
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists