[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A6434B.9040100@nic.cz>
Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2013 23:25:15 +0100
From: Jan Včelák <jan.vcelak@....cz>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC: lenb@...nel.org, rjw@...ysocki.net, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: full battery charge cannot exceed current one
>> Some degraded batteries report maximal capacity to be smaller than
>> current charge of the battery. This can confuse some user space
>> applications (like upower).
>
> Can't we just fix upower?
It looks like upower already resolved that:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/tree/src/linux/up-device-supply.c#n652
If the purpose of sysfs is to provide raw values retrieved from battery,
then I agree that this should not be handled in kernel.
Otherwise I would expect semantically correct data there.
>> + /* Some degraded batteries report lower full charge than current one. */
>> + if (battery->capacity_now > battery->full_charge_capacity)
>> + battery->full_charge_capacity = battery->capacity_now;
>> +
>
> Does upower read *_full on every read of the value? How do we guarantee
> that it won't read energy_now without updating energy_full and still
> come up with an incorrect calculation?
That's a good point. I'm not sure about other applications, but upower
always refreshes all values. Function up_device_supply_refresh_battery
seems to be the only place where 'charge_now' is being read:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/upower/tree/src/linux/up-device-supply.c#n485
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists