[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQUd+sU4GEq0687u8+26jXJiJVboN90+L7svyosmm+V1Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:06:53 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linn Crosetto <linn@...com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm,x86: fix span coverage in e820_all_mapped()
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com> wrote:
> In the following case, e820_all_mapped() will return 1.
> A < start < B-1 and B < end < C, it means <start, end> spans two regions.
> <start, end>: [start - end]
> e820 addr: ...[A - B-1][B - C]...
should be [start, end) right?
and
[A, B),[B, C)
>
> Signed-off-by: Xishi Qiu <qiuxishi@...wei.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/e820.c | 15 +++------------
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> index 174da5f..31ecab2 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/e820.c
> @@ -85,20 +85,11 @@ int __init e820_all_mapped(u64 start, u64 end, unsigned type)
>
> if (type && ei->type != type)
> continue;
> - /* is the region (part) in overlap with the current region ?*/
> + /* is the region (part) in overlap with the current region ? */
> if (ei->addr >= end || ei->addr + ei->size <= start)
> continue;
> -
> - /* if the region is at the beginning of <start,end> we move
> - * start to the end of the region since it's ok until there
> - */
> - if (ei->addr <= start)
> - start = ei->addr + ei->size;
so in your case new start will be B ?
next run will be C
> - /*
> - * if start is now at or beyond end, we're done, full
> - * coverage
> - */
> - if (start >= end)
> + /* is the region full coverage of <start, end> ? */
> + if (ei->addr <= start && ei->addr + ei->size >= end)
> return 1;
> }
> return 0;
also e820 should be sanitized already to have [A,C).
or you are talking about [A,B), [B+1, C)
first run start will be B, and next run with [B+1, ...), that will be
skipped...
will not return 1.
so old code should be ok.
Thanks
Yinghai
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists