[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210220251.GB5050@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:02:51 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: process 'stuck' at exit.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:57:49PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > http://codemonkey.org.uk/junk/trace
>
> Hmm. Ok, so something is calling [__]get_user_pages_fast() and
> put_page() in a loop, but the trace doesn't show what that "something"
> is, because it is itself not ever called.
>
> However, that pattern does seem to imply that the loop is in
> get_futex_key(), because all the other loops I see seem to be calling
> other things as well.
>
> And the __get_user_pages_fast() call implies that it's the THP case
> that triggers the "unlikely(PageTail(page))" case. And anyway,
> otherwise we'd see lock_page()/unlock_page() too.
>
> So it looks like __get_user_pages_fast() fails, and keeps failing.
> Andrea, this is your code, any ideas? Commit a5b338f2b0b1f ("thp:
> update futex compound knowledge") to be exact.
So, a reason that this might only be showing up now, is that in the last
week I added support to trinity to explicitly do huge page mmaps in the children,
whereas before it only ever did that with MAP_SHARED in the main pid, and then
every child inherited them on fork().
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists