linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Staging: android: fix parantheses coding style issue in alarm-dev.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABYqeiVRqoAZAH+9_=mn=5+fMPHtehTK7zyAagNwuuAHC_UtZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 9 Dec 2013 19:53:19 -0800
From:	"Preetam D'Souza" <preetamjdsouza@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Brian Swetland <swetland@...gle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Staging: android: fix parantheses coding style issue in alarm-dev.c

Hey Greg--I'm working against Linus' latest tree on
https://github.com/torvalds/linux.git ... which tree should I be using
for the updated code?

Thanks!
Preetam

On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 02:35:52PM -0800, Preetam D'Souza wrote:
>> This patch fixes an unecessary return statement parantheses error
>> found in alarm-dev.c by the checkpatch.pl tool -- alarm-dev.c now has
>> no more errors/warnings!
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Preetam D'Souza <preetamjdsouza@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/staging/android/alarm-dev.c |    4 ++--
>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> This was already fixed a while ago, what tree are you working against?
>
> sorry, I can't apply this again.
>
> greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/