[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A7A5D9.9030504@zytor.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:38:01 -0800
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, vgoyal@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, horms@...ge.net.au,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, greg@...ah.com, matt@...sole-pimps.org,
toshi.kani@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/14] kexec kernel efi runtime support
On 12/10/2013 03:32 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 03:25:49PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 17:42:13 +0800 Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Here is the V5 patchset for supporting kexec kernel efi runtime.
>>
>> It's unclear (to me) who's supposed to merge this lot. It's a "kexec"
>> patch which actually hits on efi and x86.
>>
>> I grabbed them for some -next testing but won't be offended if someone
>> else merges them ;)
>
> I was under the impression that this should go through Matt's efi tree.
> Oh, and we need to finish reviewing them so picking them up now would be
> too premature, IMHO.
>
My intent was to pick them into a separate branch of the tip tree either
directly or via Matt (since Matt feeds us anyway.)
But yes, work is still underway, although it is getting there.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists