[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210041826.GB31386@dastard>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:18:26 +1100
From: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: dchinner@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
glommer@...nvz.org, glommer@...il.com,
Glauber Costa <gloomer@...nvz.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 13/16] vmscan: take at least one pass with shrinkers
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:05:54PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> From: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
>
> In very low free kernel memory situations, it may be the case that we
> have less objects to free than our initial batch size. If this is the
> case, it is better to shrink those, and open space for the new workload
> then to keep them and fail the new allocations.
>
> In particular, we are concerned with the direct reclaim case for memcg.
> Although this same technique can be applied to other situations just as
> well, we will start conservative and apply it for that case, which is
> the one that matters the most.
This should be at the start of the series.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists