linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.10 18/52] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 00:00:51 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
	Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Subject: [PATCH 3.10 18/52] can: sja1000: fix {pre,post}_irq() handling and IRQ handler return value

3.10-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>

commit 2fea6cd303c0d0cd9067da31d873b6a6d5bd75e7 upstream.

This patch fixes the issue that the sja1000_interrupt() function may have
returned IRQ_NONE without processing the optional pre_irq() and post_irq()
function before. Further the irq processing counter 'n' is moved to the end of
the while statement to return correct IRQ_[NONE|HANDLED] values at error
conditions.

Reported-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Signed-off-by: Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>
Signed-off-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c |   17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/sja1000/sja1000.c
@@ -494,20 +494,20 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, v
 	uint8_t isrc, status;
 	int n = 0;
 
-	/* Shared interrupts and IRQ off? */
-	if (priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IER) == IRQ_OFF)
-		return IRQ_NONE;
-
 	if (priv->pre_irq)
 		priv->pre_irq(priv);
 
+	/* Shared interrupts and IRQ off? */
+	if (priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IER) == IRQ_OFF)
+		goto out;
+
 	while ((isrc = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_IR)) &&
 	       (n < SJA1000_MAX_IRQ)) {
-		n++;
+
 		status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_SR);
 		/* check for absent controller due to hw unplug */
 		if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
-			return IRQ_NONE;
+			goto out;
 
 		if (isrc & IRQ_WUI)
 			netdev_warn(dev, "wakeup interrupt\n");
@@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, v
 				status = priv->read_reg(priv, SJA1000_SR);
 				/* check for absent controller */
 				if (status == 0xFF && sja1000_is_absent(priv))
-					return IRQ_NONE;
+					goto out;
 			}
 		}
 		if (isrc & (IRQ_DOI | IRQ_EI | IRQ_BEI | IRQ_EPI | IRQ_ALI)) {
@@ -543,8 +543,9 @@ irqreturn_t sja1000_interrupt(int irq, v
 			if (sja1000_err(dev, isrc, status))
 				break;
 		}
+		n++;
 	}
-
+out:
 	if (priv->post_irq)
 		priv->post_irq(priv);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/