[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210083825.GB24992@lge.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:38:25 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] mm/migrate: correct failure handling if
!hugepage_migration_support()
On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 04:17:32PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>
> > We should remove the page from the list if we fail without ENOSYS,
> > since migrate_pages() consider error cases except -ENOMEM and -EAGAIN
> > as permanent failure and it assumes that the page would be removed from
> > the list. Without this patch, we could overcount number of failure.
>
> Ok what does the patch do about this? I dont see any modifications. Remove
> this part of the description?
Description is slightly wrong.
Following is correct one.
"We should remove the page from the list if we fail *with* ENOSYS,"
And this patch do this by adding putback_active_hugepage(hpage)
on ENOSYS case.
>
> > In addition, we should put back the new hugepage if
> > !hugepage_migration_support(). If not, we would leak hugepage memory.
>
> Ok looks like that is fixed by this patch.
>
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists