linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 09/16] fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args in shrink

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20131210013841.GY31386@dastard>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:38:41 +1100
From:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
To:	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc:	dchinner@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...e.cz,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, devel@...nvz.org,
	glommer@...nvz.org, glommer@...il.com,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 09/16] fs: consolidate {nr,free}_cached_objects args
 in shrink_control

On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 12:05:50PM +0400, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> We are going to make the FS shrinker memcg-aware. To achieve that, we
> will have to pass the memcg to scan to the nr_cached_objects and
> free_cached_objects VFS methods, which currently take only the NUMA node
> to scan. Since the shrink_control structure already holds the node, and
> the memcg to scan will be added to it as we introduce memcg-aware
> vmscan, let us consolidate the methods' arguments in this structure to
> keep things clean.
> 
> Thanks to David Chinner for the tip.

Ok, you dealt with this as a separate patch...

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
> Cc: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
> Cc: Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>
> Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  fs/super.c         |    8 +++-----
>  fs/xfs/xfs_super.c |    6 +++---
>  include/linux/fs.h |    6 ++++--
>  3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index a039dba..8f9a81b 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  		return SHRINK_STOP;
>  
>  	if (sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects)
> -		fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc->nid);
> +		fs_objects = sb->s_op->nr_cached_objects(sb, sc);
>  
>  	inodes = list_lru_count(&sb->s_inode_lru, sc);
>  	dentries = list_lru_count(&sb->s_dentry_lru, sc);
> @@ -96,8 +96,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  	if (fs_objects) {
>  		fs_objects = mult_frac(sc->nr_to_scan, fs_objects,
>  								total_objects);
> -		freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, fs_objects,
> -						       sc->nid);
> +		freed += sb->s_op->free_cached_objects(sb, sc, fs_objects);
>  	}

Again, pass the number to scan in sc->nr_to_scan, please.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@...morbit.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/