[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201312101352.53714.heiko@sntech.de>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:52:53 +0100
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, rjw@...ysocki.net, len.brown@...el.com,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.12 46/62] irq: Enable all irqs unconditionally in irq_resume
Am Dienstag, 10. Dezember 2013, 10:08:47 schrieb Greg Kroah-Hartman:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:01:13AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > 3.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let
> > >
> > > me know.
> >
> > Objections... well... I'm not sure if it meets stable criteria. In
> > particular, I don't think it was ever demonstrated as having bad
> > effect on the users.
>
> Well, I'm guessing someone on the cc: here wanted it in stable@, so I'll
> let them speak up as to why...
As for bad effects on users ... any suspend_noirq callback returning an error
and thus aborting the suspend will cause the error fixed by this, as the
early-irqs won't get reenabled in the suspend-rollback [due to the syscore_ops
doing their resume never being run].
You could for example lose keys connected thru the gpio-keys driver until the
next reboot.
And it seems at least Laxman and myself were affected by it.
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists