[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210145248.GD10633@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:52:51 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
jacob.w.shin@...il.com, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Arnaldo Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sherry Hurwitz <sherry.hurwitz@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf/x86/amd: AMD support for bp_len >
HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_8
On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 02:57:43PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > Ideally it would be nice if we drop bp_mask and use extended ranges
> > only when len > 8. How does that sound?
>
> Again, iirc, this is what the code does. except (in essence) it checks
> mask != 0 instead of len > 8.
>
> And yes, we can probably drop bp_mask (unless we are going to support
> the contiguous ranges), just I think we can do this later.
Ah wait, I understand now, this is not a user ABI, just an internal state.
So you're right after all.
It's never too late to be unconfused ;)
Ok let me dig into more details on the patchset.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists