[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210152430.GA1103@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:24:30 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, henrik@...tad.us, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 tip/core/locking 0/4] Memory-barrier documentation
updates
* David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 08:51:46 -0500
>
> > I wish vger wouldn't do that. I wonder how much spam is really flagged
> > by this one characteristic alone. That is, spam that would have made it
> > otherwise, but because of the Cc list, it was rejected.
>
> 10 to 20 spam posts per day are prevented by this rule.
>
> And frankly it's totally rediculous to have such a huge CC: list
> in the first place, even if the vger spam filter didn't exist.
Absolutely agreed - in fact huge Cc: lists are a PITA when committing
patches: I have to trim them down to something reasonable, without
losing important Cc: entries ...
So vger is doing us a service there, and not just by filtering spam.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists