lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1=PLssYDKm1HUR2uUSX7+Hrh6g6bB=1VntY_hH6YkdF-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2013 16:55:43 +0100
From:	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf tools: Automate setup of FEATURE_CHECK_(C|LD)FLAGS-all
 variables

Jiri,

On 10 December 2013 14:55, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 01:24:02PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Add CFLAGS and LDFLAGS for each feature to be checked during the
>> build. This allows to pass particular flags and parameters to the
>> feature checks compilation.
>>
>> Use the per-feature check flags for the unwinding feature in order
>> to correctly compile the test-all, libunwind and libunwind-debug-frame
>> feature checks.
>>
>> This change set simplifies the flags passing mechanism between the
>> Makefiles in config/Makefile and config/feature-checks; this
>> could be farther optimized by moving the compilation flags to the
>> per-feature check flags for all features to be checked.
>>
>> Tested on x86_64, ARMv7 and ARMv8 with and without LIBUNWIND_DIR
>> set in 'make -C tools/perf'
>>
>>
>> Jean Pihet (2):
>>   perf: add per-feature check flags
>>   perf: unwinding: use the per-feature check flags
>>
>>  tools/perf/config/Makefile                | 52 ++++++++++++++++++-------------
>>  tools/perf/config/feature-checks/Makefile |  8 ++---
>>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>>
>
> while at it, how about following update
Indeed the flags passing mechanism needs to be automated.
The code below looks great.

I propose to submit patches for a consolidation of the features check
Makefiles, i.e. for all features including test-all.
This is next on my ToDo list, is that OK to you?

>
> thanks,
> jirka

Jean

>
>
> ---
> Instead of explicitly adding same value into
> FEATURE_CHECK_(C|LD)FLAGS-all variables we can
> do that automatically.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/config/Makefile | 14 +++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/config/Makefile b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> index f75d814..05fd0e2 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/perf/config/Makefile
> @@ -55,9 +55,6 @@ else
>    FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libunwind = $(LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS)
>    FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-libunwind-debug-frame = $(LIBUNWIND_CFLAGS)
>    FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-libunwind-debug-frame = $(LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS)
> -  #  and the flags for the test-all case
> -  FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-all += $(LIBUNWIND_CFLAGS)
> -  FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-all += $(LIBUNWIND_LDFLAGS)
>  endif
>
>  ifeq ($(NO_PERF_REGS),0)
> @@ -168,6 +165,17 @@ CORE_FEATURE_TESTS =                       \
>         stackprotector-all              \
>         timerfd
>
> +# Set FEATURE_CHECK_(C|LD)FLAGS-all for all CORE_FEATURE_TESTS features.
> +# If in the future we need per-feature checks/flags for features not
> +# mentioned in this list we need to refactor this ;-).
> +set_test_all_flags = $(eval $(set_test_all_flags_code))
> +define set_test_all_flags_code
> +  FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-all  += $(FEATURE_CHECK_CFLAGS-$(1))
> +  FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-all += $(FEATURE_CHECK_LDFLAGS-$(1))
> +endef
> +
> +$(foreach feat,$(CORE_FEATURE_TESTS),$(call set_test_all_flags,$(feat)))
> +
>  #
>  # So here we detect whether test-all was rebuilt, to be able
>  # to skip the print-out of the long features list if the file
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ