[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131210184216.GD2390@lee--X1>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:42:16 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/15] mfd: menelaus: Pass menelaus_chip pointer to
add/remove irq functions
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 09:00:21AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 09 Dec 2013, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> >
> > > Those functions are static and can receive a menelaus_chip pointer very
> > > easily.
> > >
> > > Tested-by: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
> > > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/mfd/menelaus.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > Same here. I think this should be done in one fell swoop.
>
> then it would become a much, much larger patch which would become a pain
> to review.
If the patch was doing lots of different things then I'd be inclined
to agree, but although large, the changes here are pretty trivial.
I tend to break up patches based on; subsystem, file, device (for
platform/dts adaptions) and functionality. Rather than just because
the 'lines changed' count is large.
Please squash them and I'll review it.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists