[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABawtvM-wt2sDB=jzaapAVKjdMcdzTvNt+ohT5xXYsdzJakArw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 10:47:07 +0800
From: Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Cc: michaelc@...wisc.edu, pjones@...hat.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SCSI] iscsi_boot_sysfs: Fix a memory leak in iscsi_boot_destroy_kset()
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
> Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
>>Konrad,
>>
>> boot_kset was allocated when module loaded by
>>ibft_init()
>> iscsi_boot_create_kset()
>> kzalloc()
>>
>>but wasn't freed when module unloaded by
>>ibft_exit()
>> ibft_cleanup()
>> iscsi_boot_destroy_kset()
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Ethan
>>
>>On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 5:30 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>><konrad.wilk@...cle.com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 05:37:11PM +0800, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>>>> From: "Ethan Zhao" <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> Load and unload iscsi_ibft module will cause kernel memory leak, fix
>>it
>>>> in scsi/iscsi_boot_sysfs.c iscsi_boot_destroy_kset().
>>>>
>>>
>>> Is there a stack trace?
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ethan Zhao <ethan.kernel@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/scsi/iscsi_boot_sysfs.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_boot_sysfs.c
>>b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_boot_sysfs.c
>>>> index 14c1c8f..680bf6f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/scsi/iscsi_boot_sysfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/iscsi_boot_sysfs.c
>>>> @@ -490,5 +490,6 @@ void iscsi_boot_destroy_kset(struct
>>iscsi_boot_kset *boot_kset)
>>>> iscsi_boot_remove_kobj(boot_kobj);
>>>>
>>>> kset_unregister(boot_kset->kset);
>>>> + kfree(boot_kset);
>>>> }
>>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(iscsi_boot_destroy_kset);
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.3.4 (Apple Git-47)
>>>>
>
> Right. In the past we did not do that b/c certain drivers (like broadcom) would allocate on the kset their name and try to free (the driver would after freeing the ibft). So you would end up with this patch a double free ( and it might be fixed by now but I can't recall).
>
> My question was - did you observer a crash or bug. Hence the question about stack trace? How did you see this?
That is quite simple, just like fuzzy test, load and unload a module
millions of times with a script in low memory size machine, in the
meanwhile, monitor OOM etc.
Thanks,
Ethan
>
> Thank you.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists