linux-kernel - Re: [RFC part2 PATCH 4/9] ARM64 / ACPI: Use Parked Address in GIC structure for spin table SMP initialisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52A80E15.50404@linaro.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:02:45 +0800
From:	Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	patches@...aro.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC part2 PATCH 4/9] ARM64 / ACPI: Use Parked Address in GIC
 structure for spin table SMP initialisation

On 2013-12-10 21:03, Grant Likely wrote:
[...]
>> +/* Parked Address in ACPI GIC structure can be used as cpu release addr */
>> +int acpi_get_parked_address_with_gic_id(u32 gic_id, u64 *parked_address)
>> +{
>> +	struct acpi_table_header *table_header = NULL;
>> +	struct acpi_subtable_header *entry;
>> +	int err = 0;
>> +	unsigned long table_end;
>> +	acpi_size tbl_size;
>> +	struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *processor = NULL;
>> +
>> +	if (!parked_address)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	acpi_get_table_with_size(ACPI_SIG_MADT, 0, &table_header, &tbl_size);
>> +	if (!table_header) {
>> +		pr_warn(PREFIX "MADT table not present\n");
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	table_end = (unsigned long)table_header + table_header->length;
>> +
>> +	/* Parse all entries looking for a match. */
>> +	entry = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> +	    ((unsigned long)table_header + sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt));
>> +
>> +	while (((unsigned long)entry) + sizeof(struct acpi_subtable_header) <
>> +	       table_end) {
>> +		if (entry->type != ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT
>> +			|| BAD_MADT_ENTRY(entry, table_end))
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		processor = (struct acpi_madt_generic_interrupt *)entry;
>> +
>> +		if (processor->gic_id == gic_id) {
>> +			*parked_address = processor->parked_address;
>> +			goto out;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		entry = (struct acpi_subtable_header *)
>> +		    ((unsigned long)entry + entry->length);
> 
> All of the casting in this table looks suspicious. If you have to resort
> to casting, then the variable types are very likely wrong.
> 
> In the case immediately above, it seems that the entry size doesn't
> necessarily equal the acpi_subtable_header size, in which case you
> should cast the values to a void* instead of an unsigned long. That
> would mean you can do this:
> 
> 	entry = ((void*)entry) + entry->length;
> 
> In fact, if I were writing the code, I would have two variables; the
> iterator pointer as a void* and a header pointer as a struct
> acpi_subtable_header*. Like so:
> 
> 	void *entry, *table_end;
> 	struct acpi_subtable_header *header;
> 
> 	entry = ((void*)table_header) + sizeof(struct acpi_table_madt);
> 	table_end = ((void*)table_header) + table_header->length;
> 	while (entry + sizeof(*header)) < table_end) {
> 		header = entry;
> 
> 		if (header->type != ACPI_MADT_TYPE_GENERIC_INTERRUPT ||
> 			BAD_MADT_ENTRY(entry, table_end))
> 			continue;
> 		processor = entry;
> 
> 		if (processor->gic_id == gic_id) {
> 			*parked_address = processor->parked_address;
> 			goto out;
> 		}
> 
> 		entry += header->length;
> 	}
> 
> See? Much cleaner code.

Aha, much much cleaner, thanks for the guidance, will rework my patch
and test it.

Hanjun

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/