lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52A83258.5070506@st.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:37:28 +0000
From:	Angus Clark <angus.clark@...com>
To:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
Cc:	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	<linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/36] mtd: st_spi_fsm: Allocate resources and register
 with MTD framework

Hi Lee and Brian,

I would also like to thank Brian; as always, very sensible comments.

I am tied up most of today and off work tomorrow (Christmas shopping!), but I
will set aside Friday to go through the comments in detail.  I should also have
some time next week if necessary, subject to any panics that might arise!

I also intend to respond to Huang's updated 'spi-nor' framework at the same
time.  At some stage, I would expect some of the device probing code in
st_spi_fsm, particularly the configuration of read/write/erase operations based
on capabilities, to be pulled into the 'spi-nor' framework.  I do not see this
an an obstacle to st_spi_fsm being integrated earlier though; it's presence in
the kernel would provide another example of a H/W Controller that 'spi-nor'
needs to accommodate.

Cheers,

Angus


On 12/11/2013 08:48 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> Hi Brian,
> 
> Thank you for taking the time to review, it's very much appreciated.
> You bought out some interesting points that I'm happy to go away and
> rectify. Firstly however, as I inherited this code I'd like to give
> Angus a chance to comment before we go off on our own tangent and
> rework some of the good code which perhaps should remain unchanged.
> 
> Angus, do you have enough time to go through Brian's review comments
> and perhaps reply to the ones that you feel would benefit from your
> expert knowledge. To be frank, some of the questions that were asked I
> wouldn't be able to answer without your guidance in any case.
> 
> Thanks both.
> 
> Kind regards,
> Lee
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ