[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1386773428-bwklwan0-mutt-n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:50:28 -0500
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 8/8] sched/numa: drop unnecessary variable in
task_weight
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 09:21:23AM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 08:50:01AM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> > Drop unnecessary total_faults variable in function task_weight to unify
> > task_weight and group_weight.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Nak.
>
> task_weight is called for tasks other than current. If p handles a fault
> in parallel then it can drop to 0 between when it's checked and used to
> divide resulting in an oops.
So we have the same race on group_weight(), and we have to add a local
variable to store p->numa_group->total_faults?
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists