| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:48:18 -0700 From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>, Guo Chao <yan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/10] intel-gtt: Read 64bit for gmar_bus_addr On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote: >>> That bar could be 64bit pref mem and above 4G. >>> >>> -v2: refresh to 3.13-rc1 >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> >>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie> >>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> >> >> This looks OK to me. Does it depend on any previous patches in this >> series? If not, I think Dave should pick it up. > > No. > > could be exposed after 5-9 get applied. Doesn't that mean that this series should be reordered so this patch is *before* patches 5-9 to avoid bisection breakage? I know you've split up and reposted parts of the series, but the question still applies. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists