linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2013 12:02:50 -0800
From:	"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] binfmt_elf: fix PIE load with randomization disabled

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:43 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 12/11/2013 10:21 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:49 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>> On 12/11/2013 05:41 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> When -Ttext-segment=XXX is used, the program is expected to
>>>> load at XXX, regardless -pie is used or not.
>>>>
>>>
>>> "Expected to" by whom?  I think that is at the very best a matter of
>>> interpretation.
>>
>> # ld --help
>> ...
>>  -Ttext-segment ADDRESS      Set address of text segment
>> ...
>>
>
> I feel a very circular argument going around here... what do the actual
> user(s) of this option expect?

User expects the executable will be loaded at the address
specified by -Ttext-segment.

-- 
H.J.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/